AI Training IP: Legal Risks and Strategies for Startups Using Machine Learning Models

Why AI Training Raises Unique IP Issues

AI development challenges conventional IP categories. Training data might come from copyrighted works, trade secrets, open-source code, or scraped content. Machine learning models are sometimes treated like software, sometimes like black-box algorithms. And the outputs—especially from generative AI tools—may or may not be protectable at all.

Most AI models are trained on vast datasets, and those datasets are often collected from diverse sources across the web. But if that data includes copyrighted materials (books, images, articles, videos), your startup might be exposed to copyright infringement claims. Even if the data is publicly available, it doesn’t mean it’s legally usable for training purposes.

Legal precedent is still forming, but IP litigation against companies like OpenAI, Stability AI, and Meta shows that courts are willing to examine whether using copyrighted materials in AI training qualifies as “fair use” or something else entirely.

The IP Chain: From Input to Output

When you train or fine-tune an AI model, think of IP across three categories: the data you input, the model you train, and the outputs you generate.

First, your input data may be protected by copyright, database rights, trade secret law, or contract-based licenses. If you acquire datasets from a third party, those agreements must be clear on whether you can use them for machine learning or derivative works.

Second, the model itself may be open-source, proprietary, or commercially licensed. Hugging Face, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta all distribute models with different terms. Some allow modification and commercial use; others restrict redistribution or require attribution.

Third, the outputs—text, images, predictions—may have unclear legal status. Under current U.S. copyright law, purely AI-generated content is unlikely to receive protection unless there’s sufficient human authorship involved.

All three stages require attention. You can’t afford to treat IP as an afterthought when dealing with AI.

The Risk of Using Public Data

Many startups assume that scraping websites or public datasets is safe. But just because information is publicly accessible doesn’t mean it’s free from copyright or privacy laws. For example, training a chatbot on Reddit posts, Wikipedia articles, or news headlines might expose your company to claims from content owners or platform operators.

Moreover, jurisdictions like the European Union treat text and data mining differently from the U.S. Under the EU Copyright Directive, even machine-readable content may be protected against commercial mining unless explicitly licensed.

To mitigate risk, startups should:

• Analyze the legal status of any dataset used in training
• Use or purchase datasets with clear licensing for AI training
• Maintain records of data provenance and usage rights

Trade Secret Concerns in AI Development

If your startup is developing proprietary training techniques, algorithms, or internal datasets, these may qualify as trade secrets. But to enforce trade secret protection, you must:

• Keep this information confidential
• Limit access to only those who need to know
• Use NDAs with employees, contractors, and vendors

Accidental disclosures—such as publishing a GitHub repository or demo that reveals model architecture or training parameters—can destroy trade secret status overnight.

When to Use Open Source (and When to Avoid It)

Open-source models and datasets can accelerate development, but not all licenses are created equal. Some, like Apache 2.0 or MIT, are permissive and allow commercial use. Others, like GPL or AGPL, may require you to open-source your own modifications.

Even newer licenses like OpenRAIL or BigScience have unusual clauses about ethical use or redistribution. Always review the terms and consult counsel before integrating open-source assets into your AI pipeline.

Misusing open-source materials can later complicate your ability to raise funding, close M&A deals, or commercialize your product.

Who Owns the Outputs?

Let’s say your AI model writes a blog post, composes music, or designs a logo. Who owns that output? Under current U.S. law, copyright only applies to human authors. So unless a human plays a meaningful creative role, you might not be able to claim ownership.

This creates downstream risk. If a client pays your startup for generated content, but the content isn’t protectable or is based on copyrighted training data, they may come back with legal claims.

One emerging workaround is to structure AI use as a tool under human direction—not as an autonomous author. That way, you preserve the human element necessary for copyright eligibility.

Licensing Strategies for AI Startups

To navigate AI training IP issues successfully, startups should:

• Secure proper rights for all training datasets
• Vet all model licenses before use
• Define ownership terms clearly with customers, employees, and partners
• Build internal policies for data sourcing, model training, and output management

As your company grows, these issues will come up in due diligence. VCs and acquirers want to know: Do you actually own what you’re selling?

AI Training IP Is a Legal Infrastructure Priority

Startups that treat AI training IP seriously from day one have a major advantage. Not only do they avoid expensive legal disputes, but they also build scalable systems for innovation, licensing, and exit-readiness.

David Nima Sharifi, Esq., founder of the L.A. Tech and Media Law Firm, is a nationally recognized IP and technology attorney with decades of experience in M&A transactions, startup structuring, and high-stakes intellectual property protection, focused on digital assets and tech innovation. Featured in the Wall Street Journal and recognized among the Top 30 New Media and E-Commerce Attorneys by the Los Angeles Business Journal, David advises founders, investors, and acquirers on the legal infrastructure of innovation.

Schedule your confidential consultation now by visiting L.A. Tech and Media Law Firm or using our secure contact form.