L.A. TECH & MEDIA LAW FIRM – Intellectual Property & Technology Attorneys
A software company, SaaS platform, website, digital brand or AI-enabled business can be worth millions because of assets that do not appear clearly on a balance sheet: proprietary code, trademarks, content, licenses, customer relationships, data rights, digital distribution and technological know-how.
But what does the target actually own? What can transfer to the buyer? Which assets produce durable revenue or competitive advantage? And how might artificial intelligence change their value after closing?
L.A. Tech & Media Law provides strategic intellectual property and technology acquisition assessments to help buyers and M&A deal teams evaluate those questions early—and translate the findings into informed diligence priorities, negotiation issues and post-acquisition strategy.
For individual buyers, search funds, private equity firms, independent sponsors, family offices, strategic acquirers and their M&A counsel. Please do not submit confidential deal materials through the initial web form.
In many acquisitions, legal and financial diligence focuses on corporate structure, historical performance, contracts, liabilities, taxes and the mechanics of closing. Those reviews remain indispensable. In an IP-heavy transaction, however, the buyer also needs to understand the assets and dependencies underpinning the company’s valuation and future earnings.
A registered trademark may have limited commercial value without enduring customer demand. A software platform described as proprietary may rely heavily on third-party code or licensed AI services. A high-traffic website may depend on a fragile search channel. An AI-enabled product may hold valuable data, domain knowledge and customer workflows even when its underlying models are available from outside providers.
Our approach connects intellectual property rights, technology dependencies, commercial value drivers and forward-looking market risk—so the broader M&A team can test the investment thesis before committing to a final purchase price or closing strategy.
The central question is not simply whether the target owns intellectual property. It is whether the rights, technology and commercial capabilities being acquired support the investment you intend to make.
We assess the legal posture of the assets central to the transaction, which may include trademarks, copyrights, software and source-code rights, domain names, trade secrets, licenses, assignments, contractor-created work, open-source obligations and material third-party restrictions. We identify gaps in chain of title, potential encumbrances, infringement exposure and issues that may require specialized counsel or further investigation.
We examine material dependencies that affect ownership, continuity and potential value: software licensing, critical vendors, hosting, APIs, platform accounts, domain control, data access, integration restrictions and transition requirements. Where source-code security, architecture, cybersecurity or system performance calls for specialized technical testing, we coordinate with qualified technical professionals.
We evaluate how trademarks, software, content, data access, distribution channels and contractual rights contribute to competitive positioning and monetization. This may include brand differentiation, licensing opportunities, customer concentration, organic-search dependencies, recurring-revenue characteristics and the risks of relying on assets the seller does not fully control.
We examine whether AI could strengthen, substitute for or undermine elements of the target’s offering. Relevant issues may include third-party AI model dependence, training and output rights, data provenance, automation opportunities, differentiation of proprietary workflows, changes in customer expectations and plausible technology-development scenarios.
Our findings can help the deal team identify issues for price discussions, representations and warranties, closing conditions, indemnity provisions, transition assistance, earnout assumptions and other contractual protections. We work alongside transaction counsel and financial advisors; we do not substitute for their legal drafting, independent business valuation or financial diligence.
Where appropriate, we identify potential post-closing priorities such as consolidating rights, improving software or brand infrastructure, renegotiating licenses, improving digital distribution, integrating acquired assets and evaluating new commercialization opportunities.
Understand material IP and technology risks before acquiring a website, SaaS platform, digital product, software company, e-commerce brand or other IP-dependent business.
Evaluate whether proprietary assets, technology infrastructure and digital-market exposure support the acquisition thesis and long-term operating plan.
Add an IP and technology workstream to commercial diligence, identify asset-level value drivers and evaluate technology risks across platform and add-on acquisitions.
Obtain a focused assessment of legal rights, technology dependencies and commercialization assumptions when intangible assets account for a material portion of enterprise value.
Bring in focused IP, trademark, copyright and technology-venture experience to inform diligence requests, risk allocation and coordination with technical and financial specialists.
Analyze whether a target’s brand, software, digital assets, licensing rights or proprietary processes complement existing products, distribution channels or technology roadmaps.
Seller-side IP readiness and transaction-positioning engagements may also be available under a separately defined scope.
Our assessment can begin early and run alongside conventional due diligence. It is designed to inform and complement—not delay or replace—legal, financial, tax, operational and technical reviews.
A focused preliminary review of the target’s principal IP and technology assets, stated value proposition, material third-party dependencies, AI exposure and red flags, based on available information.
Typical deliverables: Executive risk-and-opportunity memorandum; prioritized diligence questions; a working session with the buyer or deal team; and an initial proceed, investigate further, or reconsider framework.
Illustrative planning window: one to two weeks, subject to scope, access and transaction deadlines.
A deeper, document-informed assessment of intellectual property rights, transferability, technology dependencies, digital asset value drivers, AI-related scenarios and post-close priorities. We identify matters requiring additional legal, financial or technical validation and coordinate with other advisors as appropriate.
Typical deliverables: Written assessment and risk register, material findings and diligence gaps, commercially significant value considerations, recommended negotiation priorities and an initial IP/technology integration roadmap.
Illustrative planning window: two to four weeks, subject to scope, available records, third-party specialists and deal timing.
For qualifying engagements, ongoing strategic advisory can help management prioritize IP cleanup, licensing, brand or software integration, technology investment and other commercialization initiatives.
Engagements are custom-scoped. Fixed-fee project arrangements may be available following an initial scoping discussion. Formal valuation opinions, quality-of-earnings reviews, cybersecurity audits, investment banking, securities intermediation and comprehensive M&A closing representation are not included unless expressly agreed and lawfully provided by qualified professionals.
Consider a buyer evaluating a $5 million SaaS acquisition. The seller describes its AI functionality as proprietary and points to recurring subscription revenue and customer relationships as support for the asking price.
An IP-first assessment might reveal that key software components are licensed from third parties, some contractor-created code lacks clear assignments, and the principal AI model is available through an outside API. The product might nevertheless have valuable customer workflows, a respected brand, specialized data rights and durable customer relationships.
Those findings would not, standing alone, determine the company’s fair market value. They could, however, change the buyer’s understanding of what drives the purchase price, what must be fixed before closing, and where future value might come from.
Illustrative scenario only; not a description of an actual client engagement or guaranteed result.
Legal judgment grounded in intellectual property disputes. Our perspective on ownership, enforceability, infringement and contractual rights is informed by years of work on trademarks, copyrights, technology transactions and IP conflicts.
Commercial fluency in technology ventures. We connect rights and contracts to product strategy, distribution, licensing, monetization and the broader business case for an acquisition.
Forward-looking technology analysis. We evaluate how software dependencies, AI adoption, automation and digital-market change can affect the investment thesis, rather than viewing an IP portfolio as a static inventory.
The practice is led by David Nima Sharifi, Esq., Principal Attorney of L.A. Tech & Media Law, a California attorney with nearly two decades of experience in intellectual property, technology ventures, trademark disputes and related business affairs. David has also served as an investment committee member at Westwood Ventures.
That combination matters in acquisition diligence: the work considers not only how rights are documented, but how intellectual property can break down in disputes, how technology businesses commercialize those rights, and how a buyer may ultimately need to integrate, license, enforce or defend the assets after closing.
Depending on the transaction, the assessment may intersect with other LATML practice areas:
IP due diligence examines whether the target owns or controls relevant intellectual property, which third-party rights or restrictions apply, and what legal risks may affect acquisition or post-closing use. For digital and technology businesses, the assessment can also incorporate software, data, vendor and commercialization dependencies.
Often, yes—at least at a screening level when intangible assets drive the deal. Early review can help identify fundamental concerns and prioritize information requests. Full confirmatory diligence generally requires seller cooperation and may occur after an LOI or during exclusivity.
We analyze IP-related commercial value drivers, legal limitations, risks and assumptions relevant to valuation and negotiating strategy. A formal business appraisal, fairness opinion or independently certified valuation, if needed, should be obtained from appropriately qualified valuation or financial professionals.
No. Our IP and technology assessment is designed to complement transaction counsel, financial due diligence, tax planning, technical reviews and any authorized M&A intermediary. Engagement scope and responsibilities are defined in writing.
Yes. Depending on the scope and available records, we can examine IP rights, licensing arrangements, model and API dependencies, data usage permissions, competitive differentiation, AI-related commercial risks and issues to escalate to technical or regulatory specialists.
Yes. The engagement can be structured as a discrete IP and technology diligence workstream for acquisition entrepreneurs, search funds, private equity firms, independent sponsors, family offices, corporate development teams and external M&A counsel, subject to conflicts and engagement terms.
Fees depend on the target’s assets, the stage of the transaction, the volume and quality of available records, the requested deliverables and the need for specialist participation. We can discuss a phased or fixed-fee scope after an introductory consultation.
If you’re evaluating a software company, SaaS platform, website, digital brand or other IP-heavy business, we can help identify the rights, technology dependencies and commercial assumptions that deserve attention before the transaction moves forward.
Initial inquiries should describe the transaction generally. Please do not send confidential, privileged or competitively sensitive deal materials until an appropriate engagement and secure sharing process are established. An inquiry does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Posted on Google![]()
R OlivarezTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
David and his team at L.A. Tech & Media Law were excellent to work with on our IP and contract matters. He took the time to understand our business, asked sharp questions, and delivered work that was thorough without being overcomplicated. Communication was clear and responsive throughout, and his guidance gave us real confidence that our agreements were structured correctly. Highly recommend for any business owner navigating tech, IP, or contract work.Posted on Google![]()
Lousine KaribianTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Had an initial phone consultation. Fast response and professional. Attorney was well spoken, full of great questions+answers and great personality. Will recommend attorney David Sharifi!Posted on Google![]()
Danila SidorenkoTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
David was great in helping us secure our trademark. The process was smooth from start to finish. Highly recommend!Posted on Google![]()
Brian PTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
David and the firm were great in helping with my trademark registrations. Highly recommendedPosted on Google![]()
Davit GasparyanTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
David was great in advising us on our tech startup.Posted on Google![]()
SamTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
David, thank you for everything you did for me! You’re a down to earth guy and it was a pleasure working with you. Thanks again!Posted on Google![]()
Rhett WallaceTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
Excellent work on my trademark dispute, and trademark maintenance. Very personable staff and would recommend to anyone.Posted on Google![]()
adrian morganTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
A well deserved 5 stars to this team from me. And I wouldn't hesitate to be a repeat customer, although I hope I won't have the need to use them again, lol. David was very astute in analyzing my case and jetting for the best solution. He earned my respect with that. And hats off to the team for their proficiency, that's why they come highly recommended from me.Posted on Google![]()
Think Labs GlobalTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I've trusted David and his team for 10 years, and they’ve consistently done an outstanding job. David has always gone above and beyond to protect my trademark rights. Even in cases that seemed uncertain, his team presented strong arguments and fought hard—ultimately securing successful outcomes. I truly appreciate their dedication and expertise.Posted on Google![]()
Sydney OzawaTrustindex verifies that the original source of the review is Google.
I had the pleasure of working with David during a difficult legal matter and I couldn’t have asked for better representation! Thanks David for your timely communication, expertise, and professionalism.
Schedule Confidential Consultation
Call 310-751-0181 or Use this Form